For y′′Differentiate y′ using the quotient rule. Let u=−y(2x+cos(xy)) and
v=x(x+cos(xy)).
First, u′=−y′(2x+cos(xy))−y(2−sin(xy)(y+xy′)).
v′=(x+cos(xy))+x(1−sin(xy)(y+xy′)).
y′′=v2u′v−uv′
This is extremely tedious but tests whether students correctly apply the product rule to the xy
term inside sin(xy)A common error point. The key misconception: students often write
dxd[sin(xy)]=cos(xy) instead of
cos(xy)⋅dxd[xy]=cos(xy)(y+xy′).
UT-3: Mean Value Theorem and Differentiability Implies Continuity
Question:
Let f(x)=3x=x1/3.
(a) Show that f is continuous on [−1,8]. (b) Show that f satisfies the conclusion of the Mean
Value Theorem on [−1,8] by finding all values c in (−1,8) such that
f′(c)=8−(−1)f(8)−f(−1). (c) Identify the point where f is not
differentiable and explain why this does not contradict the MVT.
Solution:
(a) f(x)=x1/3 is a root function, continuous on all of RSo it is continuous on
[−1,8].
(b) 8−(−1)f(8)−f(−1)=92−(−1)=93=31.
f′(x)=31x−2/3=33x21
Set f′(c)=31:
33c21=31⟹3c2=1⟹c2=1⟹c=±1
Since we need c∈(−1,8): c=−1 is an endpoint, not in (−1,8). So the only solution is
c=1.
(c) f′(x)=33x21 is undefined at x=0 (the denominator is zero). So f is
not differentiable at x=0.
This does not contradict the MVT because the MVT requires differentiability on the open interval
(−1,8) and continuity on the closed interval [−1,8]. Since 0∈(−1,8)The hypothesis
of the MVT is actually not satisfied.
The fact that we found c=1 is a coincidence — the MVT conclusion happened to hold even though
the hypothesis was not met. This is the key trap: the MVT gives a sufficient condition, not a
necessary one. Students often incorrectly believe that finding such a c proves the function
satisfies the MVT hypotheses.
Integration Tests
Tests synthesis of derivatives with other topics.
IT-1: Related Rates with Geometric and Trigonometric Constraints (with Integrals)
Question:
A 13-foot ladder leans against a vertical wall. The bottom of the ladder slides away from the wall
at 2 ft/s. A point P is located 5 feet from the top of the ladder (measured along the ladder).
(a) How fast is the top of the ladder sliding down the wall when the bottom is 5 feet from the wall?
(b) Find the rate of change of the area of the triangle formed by the ladder, wall, and ground at
the same instant. (c) The point P traces a curve (a “ladder curve”). Set up (but do not evaluate)
an integral for the arc length of this curve from the moment the ladder starts sliding (bottom at
the wall) until the bottom is 5 feet from the wall.
Solution:
(a) Let x = distance from wall to base, y = height on wall. By Pythagoras: x2+y2=169.
(c) The point P has coordinates. The bottom of the ladder is at (x,0) and the top at (0,y)
where y=169−x2. The point P is 5 feet from the top, so measured from the bottom it
is 13−5=8 feet along the ladder.
Px=x−138x=135x,Py=138y=138169−x2
The curve starts when x=0 (bottom at wall) and ends at x=5.
IT-2: Optimization with Constraint Verification (with Integrals)
Question:
Find the rectangle of maximum area that can be inscribed in the region bounded by y=4−x2 and
y=0With one side on the x-axis. Verify your answer is a maximum using the second derivative
test, and then compute the area between the curve and the rectangle that is not covered by the
rectangle.
Solution:
The parabola y=4−x2 intersects the x-axis at x=±2. A rectangle with base from −a
to a (symmetry) on the x-axis has height 4−a2.
Area: A(a)=2a(4−a2)=8a−2a3 for 0<a<2.
A′(a)=8−6a2=0⟹a2=34⟹a=323
A''(a) = -12a \lt 0 \text{ for a > 0
Since A′′(323)=−12⋅323=−83<0This
is a local maximum (and by endpoints, the global maximum on [0,2]).
Maximum area:
A(323)=2⋅323(4−34)=343⋅38=9323.
The area between the curve and the rectangle (the two “caps”):
\text{Uncovered area = 2\int_{\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}}^{2}(4 - x^2)\,dx = 2\left[4x - \frac{x^3}{3}\right]_{\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}}^{2}
The common misconception: students apply FTC part 1 without the chain rule when the bounds are
functions of x rather than x itself. The correct formula is:
dxd∫a(x)b(x)f(t)dt=f(b(x))⋅b′(x)−f(a(x))⋅a′(x)
Summary
The key principles covered in this topic are linked in the sub-pages above. Focus on understanding
the definitions, applying the formulas or frameworks, and evaluating strengths and limitations of
each approach.
Worked Examples
Worked examples demonstrating the application of key concepts are covered in the detailed sub-pages
linked above.
Common Pitfalls
Confusing terminology or concepts that appear similar but have distinct meanings.
Overlooking key assumptions or boundary conditions that limit applicability.