Sequences and Series -- Diagnostic Tests [BC Only]
Sequences and Series — Diagnostic Tests [BC Only]
Unit Tests
Tests edge cases, boundary conditions, and common misconceptions for sequences and series.
UT-1: Choosing the Correct Convergence Test for a Tricky Series
Question:
Determine whether n=1∑∞n+(−1)n(−1)n converges
conditionally, converges absolutely, or diverges.
A student applies the alternating series test and concludes it converges conditionally because
n+(−1)n1 decreases to 0. Identify the flaw in this reasoning and determine
the correct answer.
Solution:
The alternating series test requires that bn=n+(−1)n1 is positive and
decreasing. Let us check if bn is decreasing.
b1=1−11 is undefined (division by zero). So the series is not even well-defined
starting from n=1.
The first part n(−1)n⋅n−1n converges by the alternating series
test (since n(n−1)n=n−1n→0 and is eventually decreasing).
The second part
−n−11=−n=2∑∞n−11=−k=1∑∞k1
is the negative harmonic series, which diverges.
Since a convergent series minus a divergent series diverges, the original series diverges.
UT-2: Taylor Series Remainder and Lagrange Error Bound
Question:
Use the Maclaurin series for ex to approximate e0.3 using the first three nonzero terms.
(a) Compute the approximation. (b) Use the Lagrange error bound to find an upper bound on the
absolute error. (c) The actual value is e0.3≈1.3498588. Compute the actual error and
verify it is within the bound. (d) A student claims “since the Maclaurin series for ex converges
for all xThe error must go to zero.” Explain why this does not mean the error is zero for any
finite number of terms.
Solution:
(a) The Maclaurin series: ex=1+x+2!x2+3!x3+⋯
First three nonzero terms: 1+0.3+20.09=1+0.3+0.045=1.345.
(b) The Lagrange remainder after n terms: ∣Rn(x)∣≤(n+1)!M∣x∣n+1 where
M=max∣f(n+1)(c)∣ for c between 0 and x.
After 3 terms (n=3Using up to the x2 term), the next term involves f(3)(x)=ex:
∣R2(0.3)∣≤3!e0.3⋅(0.3)3=6e0.3⋅0.027
Since e0.3<e1<3:
∣R2(0.3)∣<63⋅0.027=60.081=0.0135
A tighter bound using e0.3<1.35:
∣R2(0.3)∣<61.35⋅0.027=0.006075
(c) Actual error: ∣e0.3−1.345∣=∣1.3498588−1.345∣=0.0048588.
Is 0.0048588<0.0135? Yes. Is 0.0048588<0.006075? Yes. The error is within both bounds.
(d) Convergence of the series means the partial sums approachex as the number of terms goes
to infinity. For any finite number of terms, there is a nonzero remainder. The series “converging”
is a statement about the limit of partial sums, not about any individual partial sum. This is the
distinction between an infinite process and its finite approximation.
UT-3: Radius and Interval of Convergence with Endpoint Analysis
Question:
Find the radius and interval of convergence of
n=1∑∞n⋅3n(x−2)n.
The ratio test gives convergence when 3∣x−2∣<1I.e., ∣x−2∣<3.
Radius of convergence:R=3.
Endpoints:
x=5: n=1∑∞n⋅3n3n=n=1∑∞n1
— the harmonic series, which diverges.
x=−1:
n=1∑∞n⋅3n(−3)n=n=1∑∞n(−1)n
— the alternating harmonic series, which converges conditionally (by the alternating series
test: n1→0 and decreases).
Interval of convergence:[−1,5).
Integration Tests
Tests synthesis of sequences and series with other topics.
IT-1: Power Series Differentiation to Evaluate a Sum (with Derivatives)
Question:
Starting from the geometric series n=0∑∞xn=1−x1 for
∣x∣<1Find the exact value of n=1∑∞2nn2.
IT-2: Taylor Polynomial Integration (with Integrals)
Question:
(a) Find the fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial T4(x) for f(x)=cos(x2). (b) Use T4(x) to
approximate ∫00.5cos(x2)dx. (c) Bound the error in this approximation
using the Lagrange remainder.
Solution:
(a) Start with cosu=1−2!u2+4!u4−⋯. Substitute u=x2:
cos(x2)=1−2!x4+4!x8−⋯=1−2x4+24x8−⋯
The fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial (all terms through x4):
(c) The next term in the series is 24x8. The error from truncating after the x4 term
is bounded by:
∣R4(x)∣≤6!M∣x∣6
Where M=max∣f(6)(c)∣ for c∈[0,0.5]. This is complicated. Instead, bound using the
next series term:
Since the series for cos(x2) is alternating and the terms decrease in magnitude for
∣x∣<1The error in truncating after the x4 term is at most the magnitude of the next term:
More rigorously, using the Lagrange form: f(5)(x) involves sin(x2) and cos(x2) terms.
The maximum of ∣f(5)(c)∣ on [0,0.5] is bounded (all derivatives of cos(x2) are bounded
by polynomials in c times sines and cosines). The alternating series bound gives a cleaner result
and is sufficient for the AP exam.
IT-3: Series Convergence via Integral Test (with Integrals and Limits)
Question:
Determine whether n=2∑∞n(lnn)p1 converges for: (a) p=2
(b) p=1 (c) General p
Then, for the convergent case(s), use the integral test remainder bound to determine how many terms
are needed to approximate the sum to within 0.001.
Solution:
Let f(x)=x(lnx)p1 for x≥2. This is positive, continuous, and decreasing for
x≥2 (when p>0).
Let u=lnx, du=xdx:
∫2∞x(lnx)pdx=∫ln2∞updu
(a) p=2:
∫ln2∞u2du=[−u1]ln2∞=ln21<∞.
The series converges.
(b) p=1:
∫ln2∞udu=[lnu]ln2∞=∞. The
series diverges.
(c) The p-integral ∫updu converges iff p>1. Therefore:
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n(\ln n)^p} \text{ converges iff p > 1
For the remainder bound with p=2: the error from using N terms satisfies:
RN≤∫N∞x(lnx)2dx=lnN1
We need lnN1<0.001:
lnN>1000⟹N>e1000
This is astronomically large, showing that despite convergence, the series converges extremely
slowly. This illustrates an important limitation of the integral test for error bounds: convergence
does not imply practical computability.
For comparison, even p=1.01 gives:
∫N∞u1.01du=0.01N−0.01=100N−0.01
Setting 100N−0.01<0.001: N−0.01<0.00001So N0.01>100000Giving
N>100000100. Still impractical. The series ∑n(lnn)p1 converges very slowly
for p near 1.
Summary
The key principles covered in this topic are linked in the sub-pages above. Focus on understanding
the definitions, applying the formulas or frameworks, and evaluating strengths and limitations of
each approach.
Worked Examples
Worked examples demonstrating the application of key concepts are covered in the detailed sub-pages
linked above.
Common Pitfalls
Confusing terminology or concepts that appear similar but have distinct meanings.
Overlooking key assumptions or boundary conditions that limit applicability.